Tuesday, July 14, 2015

EDU 6250: Obstacles Project

Obstacles Project
1. Insufficient access to technology
-Not enough devices for a school
-Not enough internet access to support devices
-Not enough money to give needed supports
-Even with labs fighting for sign-up time, allowing for computer sign in and sign out, losing too much time
2. Attitudes/beliefs
-“Old school” teachers not wanting to change
-Some teachers may not realize the impact technology will have in life outside of school
-More shaped by teacher’s attitude rather than the students
-Seen as busy work rather than creative learning
3. School culture
-Low-income schools: little money or resources at home
-Administrators that are not supportive of teachers or their ideas
-Example: people liking books or printed texts versus an electronic copy
-People in power having lack of knowledge how to implement technology. Tools become used for testing or basic research
4. Overload of assessment
-Recently technology is being used for testing like PARCC
-Leaves little time for other uses of technology
-Focus on testing rather than creative learning with technology
-Test skills versus 21st century skills
5. Administration/school leaders
-People who make tech decisions have not been in the classroom in a long time
-Do they actually research tech or are they getting the next big thing?
-In terms of social media: will they support you in your decisions? What happens if they don’t?
-Lack of teacher input for platforms, devices, and software
6. Lack of skills
-Teachers not being familiar with ALL devices and apps
-Students not having any access to tech before coming to school, especially in low income areas
-No on-going support in the classroom or even no initial training
-Just getting students to touch devices

Conley, Laurie. 2010. “Barriers to Integrating Technology.” Retrieved from: https://sites.google.com/site/thedigitallibrarian/barriers-to-integrating-technology
Greaves, T.; Hayes, J.; Wilson, L.; Gielniak, M.; & Peterson, R. 2010. The Technology Factor: Nine Keys to Student Achievement and Cost-Effectiveness. 169.
Innovative Teaching and Learning 2011 Findings and Implications. (2011). 40.

No comments:

Post a Comment